User talk:XxNoobTubezz

Vehicle modification reverted
Hi I am quite unhappy with the modification you made on the "vehicle" page. A lot of good information was removed: armor thickness, vehicle comments, distinction between driver MG/passenger MG. Moreover, giving the exact name of the tank cannons made cannon comparison less easy. If you want to add data (changing "MG" for real name) ok, but be careful not to remove info of this page, which purpose is, over all, to compare vehicles easily. Regards, LienRag99 (talk) 23:09, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Dear, Lienrag99
 * I am sorry to have upset you, I had thought that the current details regarding the vehicles was quite underwhelming and messy, however I will admit that it was my fault as I did not have the proper time to complete the article but saved it anyways. I ask for your forgiveness and if it is okay with you, I will rework the vehicle page, however this time instead of completely removing information I will simply add on what is already there. However there are somethings I may change for example, the vehicle armaments differ from eachother even though they are the same (50. Caliber MG, 12.7x99 MG .etc) and the vehicle comments stating non-factual evidence such as the M18's saying "Best Tank Destroyer in-game". Once again I am very sorry I had upset you, I just want to remind you that my intention is to help improve the database in which many players of this community go to to learn about a game they enjoy.
 * Sincerely, xxNoobTubezz
 * Hi, I understand your arguments, and i don't disagree with them. Feel free to try and modify/add things, as long as you don't remove too much. However, remember those two points:
 * On the vehicle part, the goal is to give interesting information while being concise. If you think the type of MG should be precised, go ahead, however, be cautious that being too precise on armor guns make it difficult to compare. And, please do not merge "driver" and "passenger" gun information.
 * This page should be a help for the players. Therefore, "non factual statings" are sometimes interesting in order to give newcomers hints on the game. "Fast", "good climber", "best", etc. are somewhat interesting information, even if arguable. But i agree that "Best TD in game" is a bit quick to say.
 * Regards, LienRag99 (talk) 21:57, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Nice modification you made. I like the compromises you chose. Regards, LienRag99 (talk) 18:31, 1 December 2016 (UTC)